🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart nuclear discussions with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy was effective, and shared new appeals had come from mediators to reopen negotiations with the US government. He claimed Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Path

Araghchi is walking a complex path since Iran does not want appear to be proceeding from a situation of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more resilient militarily and mentally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will never give up" – the key factor of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Negotiations Suddenly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that culminated with the US president asserting the sites had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations exercised their privilege to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an local partnership with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the arrangement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Present Position

Iranian officials stated the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in some form if talks reopen.

The US president recently said he had been getting signals that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iran's diplomats say they are not yet receiving coherent offers from the United States either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Stance

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that misuses the notion of global regulations, Araghchi stated the 12-day war showed the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the attacks began with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and collaboration, making confidence hard to restore.

Dialogue Continues the Final Resolution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly attempted to enforce their desires during the discussions. Dialogue can still be alive and stays the primary resolution to settle conflicts, but its requirements, guidelines and tenets must be respected."

"Provided that they address to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent language."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the conflict of restoration and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to destroy, continues to exist. The sites and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but did not succeed to break. The nation of Iran have grown stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."